<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Joseph Simpson &#8211; Do I Have A Case? &#8211; No win no fee Solicitors</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/author/joel-sudworth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk</link>
	<description>Dispute Resolution Solicitors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2023 10:09:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>Gross Misconduct &#8211; Burchell Test / Range of Reasonable Responses</title>
		<link>https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/gross-misconduct-burchell-test-range-of-reasonable-responses/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Simpson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jun 2013 21:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/?p=2469</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Tom talks about gross misconduct and the Burchell Test / Range of Reasonable Responses.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/gross-misconduct-burchell-test-range-of-reasonable-responses/">Gross Misconduct &#8211; Burchell Test / Range of Reasonable Responses</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk">Do I Have A Case? - No win no fee Solicitors</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vince Cable set to announce new &#8216;settlement agreement&#8217; legislation</title>
		<link>https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/vince-cable-set-to-announce-new-settlement-agreement-legislation/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Simpson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jun 2013 21:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/?p=2462</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Tom Street talks about Vince Cable announcing new legislation on settlement agreements.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/vince-cable-set-to-announce-new-settlement-agreement-legislation/">Vince Cable set to announce new &#8216;settlement agreement&#8217; legislation</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk">Do I Have A Case? - No win no fee Solicitors</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Contributory Fault &#8211; Can&#8217;t blame the employer for everything!</title>
		<link>https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/contributory-fault-cant-blame-the-employer-for-everything/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Simpson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:38:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unfair Dismissal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contributory fault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gross misconduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[misconduct]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/?p=2456</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Following success at a tribunal most Claimant’s will be awarded a basic and a compensatory award. What employee’s need to be aware of is that their conduct prior to their dismissal might impact on any final award that is given in their favour. The reductions to both the basic award and compensatory award due to ... <a title="Contributory Fault &#8211; Can&#8217;t blame the employer for everything!" class="read-more" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/contributory-fault-cant-blame-the-employer-for-everything/" aria-label="More on Contributory Fault &#8211; Can&#8217;t blame the employer for everything!">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/contributory-fault-cant-blame-the-employer-for-everything/">Contributory Fault &#8211; Can&#8217;t blame the employer for everything!</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk">Do I Have A Case? - No win no fee Solicitors</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Swearing in the workplace</title>
		<link>https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/swearing-in-the-workplace/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Simpson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unfair Dismissal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gross misconduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[misconduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swearing at work]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/?p=2452</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Although swearing in the workplace was often commonplace in what could be viewed as male dominated environments such as construction it has started to migrate to other areas of the working world.Employee&#8217;s do need to be careful though as many a company policy on gross misconduct will include swearing within it and so we&#8217;d advise ... <a title="Swearing in the workplace" class="read-more" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/swearing-in-the-workplace/" aria-label="More on Swearing in the workplace">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/swearing-in-the-workplace/">Swearing in the workplace</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk">Do I Have A Case? - No win no fee Solicitors</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>UNISON set to challenge Employment Tribunal fees</title>
		<link>https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/unison-set-to-challenge-employment-tribunal-fees/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Simpson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment law review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment tribunal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment tribunals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fees]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/?p=2450</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>UNISON have today announced that they are considering applying for a judicial review of the government’s decision to introduce fees for Claimants in the Employment Tribunals. The basis upon which they are seeking to challenge the decision are: (1) on the basis that it is unlawful for Claimants to have to pay fees to exercise ... <a title="UNISON set to challenge Employment Tribunal fees" class="read-more" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/unison-set-to-challenge-employment-tribunal-fees/" aria-label="More on UNISON set to challenge Employment Tribunal fees">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/unison-set-to-challenge-employment-tribunal-fees/">UNISON set to challenge Employment Tribunal fees</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk">Do I Have A Case? - No win no fee Solicitors</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Very Few Fathers take Extra Paternity Leave</title>
		<link>https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/very-few-fathers-take-extra-paternity-leave/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Simpson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 14:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maternity Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paternity leave]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/?p=2446</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>According to a study by the TUC for the year 2011/2012, less than 1% of fathers take advantage of additional paternity leave up to a total of 26 weeks. The study found that just 1,650 out of 285,000 men took the extra paternity leave. The additional paternity leave is paid at the statutory rate of ... <a title="Very Few Fathers take Extra Paternity Leave" class="read-more" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/very-few-fathers-take-extra-paternity-leave/" aria-label="More on Very Few Fathers take Extra Paternity Leave">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/very-few-fathers-take-extra-paternity-leave/">Very Few Fathers take Extra Paternity Leave</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk">Do I Have A Case? - No win no fee Solicitors</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Companies might be banned from asking about Territorial Army activity</title>
		<link>https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/companies-might-be-banned-from-asking-about-territorial-army-activity/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Simpson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 16:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/?p=1825</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In plans being drawn up by Philip Hammond, the Defence Secretary, TA reservists could be offered similar rights to those available to pregnant women, in an effort to prevent employment discrimination. Proposals will be published when parliament reconvenes after the summer break to rapidly increase the numbers of the Territorial Army, to essentially replace thousands ... <a title="Companies might be banned from asking about Territorial Army activity" class="read-more" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/companies-might-be-banned-from-asking-about-territorial-army-activity/" aria-label="More on Companies might be banned from asking about Territorial Army activity">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/companies-might-be-banned-from-asking-about-territorial-army-activity/">Companies might be banned from asking about Territorial Army activity</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk">Do I Have A Case? - No win no fee Solicitors</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Zero Hours&#8221; employment contracts found not to represent the reality of relationship</title>
		<link>https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/zero-hours-employment-contracts-found-not-to-represent-the-reality-of-relationship/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Simpson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 20:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment tribunals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zero hours]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/?p=1806</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Employers have over recent years, found innumerate ways of benefitting from someone&#8217;s work, whilst endeavouring to avoid the rights and responsibilities which come with having an actual &#8220;employee&#8221;. We have seen contracts for casual workers, as well as &#8220;arms-length&#8221; relationships with contractors and sub-contractors. One of the most popular recent mechanisms for &#8220;taking someone on&#8221; ... <a title="&#8220;Zero Hours&#8221; employment contracts found not to represent the reality of relationship" class="read-more" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/zero-hours-employment-contracts-found-not-to-represent-the-reality-of-relationship/" aria-label="More on &#8220;Zero Hours&#8221; employment contracts found not to represent the reality of relationship">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/zero-hours-employment-contracts-found-not-to-represent-the-reality-of-relationship/">&#8220;Zero Hours&#8221; employment contracts found not to represent the reality of relationship</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk">Do I Have A Case? - No win no fee Solicitors</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Case Review: Muslim employee who wore headscarf to work &#8220;forced to resign&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/case-review-muslim-employee-who-wore-headscarf-to-work-forced-to-resign/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Simpson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 17:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headscarf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[muslim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religious discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unfair dimissal]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/?p=1802</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A luggage retailer based in Piccadilly, Central London, forced a Muslim employee to resign after she wore a headscarf to the store which wanted to retain a &#8220;trendy image&#8221;. Ms Farrah brought a claim for both unfair dismissal and direct discrimination on grounds of religion against her former employer, Global Luggage Co. The claimant originally ... <a title="Case Review: Muslim employee who wore headscarf to work &#8220;forced to resign&#8221;" class="read-more" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/case-review-muslim-employee-who-wore-headscarf-to-work-forced-to-resign/" aria-label="More on Case Review: Muslim employee who wore headscarf to work &#8220;forced to resign&#8221;">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/case-review-muslim-employee-who-wore-headscarf-to-work-forced-to-resign/">Case Review: Muslim employee who wore headscarf to work &#8220;forced to resign&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk">Do I Have A Case? - No win no fee Solicitors</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Case Review: Woman wrongly accused of watching porn at work wins £20k unfair dismissal case</title>
		<link>https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/woman-wrong-accused-of-watching-porn-at-work-wins-20k-unfair-dismissal-case/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Simpson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 16:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unfair Dismissal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment tribunals]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/?p=1774</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A married churchgoing mother, 50, has won a £20,000 unfair dismissal claim after she was wrongfully accused of watching pornographic material whilst at work. Mrs Buckley had worked as a Finance Manager for a dental laboratory in Oldham, Lancashire for 10 years, but in 2010 was questioned on why she has been looking at hardcore ... <a title="Case Review: Woman wrongly accused of watching porn at work wins £20k unfair dismissal case" class="read-more" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/woman-wrong-accused-of-watching-porn-at-work-wins-20k-unfair-dismissal-case/" aria-label="More on Case Review: Woman wrongly accused of watching porn at work wins £20k unfair dismissal case">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/woman-wrong-accused-of-watching-porn-at-work-wins-20k-unfair-dismissal-case/">Case Review: Woman wrongly accused of watching porn at work wins £20k unfair dismissal case</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk">Do I Have A Case? - No win no fee Solicitors</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
