<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Case Review &#8211; Do I Have A Case? &#8211; No win no fee Solicitors</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/category/case-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk</link>
	<description>Dispute Resolution Solicitors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2023 08:24:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>Indirect Discrimination &#8211; Little v Richmond Pharmacology</title>
		<link>https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/indirect-discrimination-update-little-v-richmond-pharmacology/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ellie Humphris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2013 11:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Review]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/?p=3934</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The recent case of Little v Richmond Pharmacology confirms that indirect discrimination can, in certain circumstances, be &#8221;cured&#8221; by an internal appeal process. The Facts Ms Little requested to return to work  flexibly after maternity leave, when her request was refused, she resigned claiming that her employer, a clinical research organisation (the Respondent), had acted ... <a title="Indirect Discrimination &#8211; Little v Richmond Pharmacology" class="read-more" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/indirect-discrimination-update-little-v-richmond-pharmacology/" aria-label="More on Indirect Discrimination &#8211; Little v Richmond Pharmacology">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/indirect-discrimination-update-little-v-richmond-pharmacology/">Indirect Discrimination &#8211; Little v Richmond Pharmacology</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk">Do I Have A Case? - No win no fee Solicitors</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stuart v London City Airport</title>
		<link>https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/an-employers-duty-to-conduct-thorough-investigations/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ellie Humphris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2013 12:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disciplinary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stuart V London City Airport]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/?p=3908</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>New guidance has emerged from the Court of Appeal in the case of Stuart v London City Airport concerning an employer&#8217;s duty to conduct investigations before dismissing staff in cases of alleged gross misconduct. Where misconduct is alleged the Burchell Test requires that at the time of dismissal the employer must have (a) believed the ... <a title="Stuart v London City Airport" class="read-more" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/an-employers-duty-to-conduct-thorough-investigations/" aria-label="More on Stuart v London City Airport">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/an-employers-duty-to-conduct-thorough-investigations/">Stuart v London City Airport</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk">Do I Have A Case? - No win no fee Solicitors</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Employers Required to Pay for Psychiatric Treatment</title>
		<link>https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/employers-required-to-pay-for-psychiatric-counselling/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ellie Humphris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 12:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employers duty to pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equality act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psychiatric treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reasonable adjustments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/?p=3876</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The recent Employment Appeal Tribunal case of Croft Vets v Butcher has given rise to the possibility that employers may be required to pay for psychiatric treatment or counselling for their depressed employees. The appeal in Croft centred around an employee who had taken time off work because she was suffering from work-related stress and ... <a title="Employers Required to Pay for Psychiatric Treatment" class="read-more" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/employers-required-to-pay-for-psychiatric-counselling/" aria-label="More on Employers Required to Pay for Psychiatric Treatment">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/employers-required-to-pay-for-psychiatric-counselling/">Employers Required to Pay for Psychiatric Treatment</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk">Do I Have A Case? - No win no fee Solicitors</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Case Review: Ebay (UK) Ltd v Buzzeo</title>
		<link>https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/case-review-ebay-uk-ltd-v-buzzeo/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Street]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 10:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unfair Dismissal]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/?p=3763</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Confusing Issue of an Effective Date of Termination Any firm of employment law solicitors worth their salt will be able to advise you on when you have to get a tribunal claim submitted by when making an unfair dismissal claim. As it currently stands under s.111 Employment Rights Act 1996 this is 3 months ... <a title="Case Review: Ebay (UK) Ltd v Buzzeo" class="read-more" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/case-review-ebay-uk-ltd-v-buzzeo/" aria-label="More on Case Review: Ebay (UK) Ltd v Buzzeo">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/case-review-ebay-uk-ltd-v-buzzeo/">Case Review: Ebay (UK) Ltd v Buzzeo</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk">Do I Have A Case? - No win no fee Solicitors</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Case Review: Wright v North Ayrshire Council</title>
		<link>https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/case-review-wright-v-north-ayrshire-council/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Street]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2013 11:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constructive Dismissal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constructive dismissal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment law]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/?p=3752</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Case of Wright v North Ayrshire Council is a welcome reminder that although constructive dismissal cases are hard to prove; you will often hear this when enquiring about employment law advice; they are not insurmountable. As long as there has been a breach by your employer there is potentially a case to be taken ... <a title="Case Review: Wright v North Ayrshire Council" class="read-more" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/case-review-wright-v-north-ayrshire-council/" aria-label="More on Case Review: Wright v North Ayrshire Council">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/case-review-wright-v-north-ayrshire-council/">Case Review: Wright v North Ayrshire Council</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk">Do I Have A Case? - No win no fee Solicitors</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Case Review: Caravan Park Manager Loses Unfair Dismissal Claim</title>
		<link>https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/case-review-caravan-park-manager-loses-unfair-dismissal-claim/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chloe.george]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Oct 2013 12:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constructive dismissal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unfair Dismissal]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/?p=3650</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A caravan park manager who resigned from his job after two money-making schemes had been discovered by his employers, has lost his unfair dismissal claim. Clarence Fitzsimmons who had managed the caravan park in Rhyl for 7 years, resigned in February 2013 but claimed constructive unfair dismissal. Mr Fitzsimmons claimed that pressure from the park ... <a title="Case Review: Caravan Park Manager Loses Unfair Dismissal Claim" class="read-more" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/case-review-caravan-park-manager-loses-unfair-dismissal-claim/" aria-label="More on Case Review: Caravan Park Manager Loses Unfair Dismissal Claim">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/case-review-caravan-park-manager-loses-unfair-dismissal-claim/">Case Review: Caravan Park Manager Loses Unfair Dismissal Claim</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk">Do I Have A Case? - No win no fee Solicitors</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Case Review: Convicted paedophile gets £30,000 in redundancy claim</title>
		<link>https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/case-review-convicted-paedophile-awarded-30000-in-redundancy-claim/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chloe.george]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2013 19:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criminal conviction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[holiday pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redundancy pay]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/?p=3641</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A convicted paedophile has won compensation of over £30,000 after bringing a redundancy claim action against his former employers from his prison cell according to the Daily Mail. Robert Wills took his former employers RWE NPower to an Employment Tribunal following their refusal to pay him a redundancy claim settlement in light of his sentence ... <a title="Case Review: Convicted paedophile gets £30,000 in redundancy claim" class="read-more" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/case-review-convicted-paedophile-awarded-30000-in-redundancy-claim/" aria-label="More on Case Review: Convicted paedophile gets £30,000 in redundancy claim">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/case-review-convicted-paedophile-awarded-30000-in-redundancy-claim/">Case Review: Convicted paedophile gets £30,000 in redundancy claim</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk">Do I Have A Case? - No win no fee Solicitors</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Case Review: Special Needs Teacher &#8220;Dismissed Unfairly&#8221;</title>
		<link>https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/case-review-special-needs-teacher-dismissed-unfairly/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chloe.george]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2013 11:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mental health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unfair Dismissal]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/?p=3636</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>As reported by the Watford Observer last week, a former special needs teacher was &#8220;dismissed unfairly&#8221; from Central Primary School in Watford. Kay Hart had been sacked after suffering severe depression, following the sudden death of her husband. An Employment Tribunal heard that Mrs Hart&#8217;s husband of 26 years, Graham, died suddenly at the age ... <a title="Case Review: Special Needs Teacher &#8220;Dismissed Unfairly&#8221;" class="read-more" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/case-review-special-needs-teacher-dismissed-unfairly/" aria-label="More on Case Review: Special Needs Teacher &#8220;Dismissed Unfairly&#8221;">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/case-review-special-needs-teacher-dismissed-unfairly/">Case Review: Special Needs Teacher &#8220;Dismissed Unfairly&#8221;</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk">Do I Have A Case? - No win no fee Solicitors</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Case Review: Fire Station Chief Sues for Racial Discrimination</title>
		<link>https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/case-review-fire-station-chief-sues-for-racial-discrimination/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chloe.george]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Oct 2013 11:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bullying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethnicity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fire service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harassment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racial discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[victimisation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/?p=3625</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A black fire station officer has sued his employers for racial discrimination after claims that his colleagues nicknamed him Malcolm X and Frank Bruno. An Employment Tribunal in Birmingham heard that Warren Simpson, 48, had joined the fire brigade in 1985. He claims that in his first week he was labelled &#8220;Frank Bruno&#8221;. Mr Simpson ... <a title="Case Review: Fire Station Chief Sues for Racial Discrimination" class="read-more" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/case-review-fire-station-chief-sues-for-racial-discrimination/" aria-label="More on Case Review: Fire Station Chief Sues for Racial Discrimination">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/case-review-fire-station-chief-sues-for-racial-discrimination/">Case Review: Fire Station Chief Sues for Racial Discrimination</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk">Do I Have A Case? - No win no fee Solicitors</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Case Review: Former employee forced to hand over Linkedin password</title>
		<link>https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/case-review-former-employee-forced-to-hand-over-linkedin-password/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chloe.george]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2013 14:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breach of contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confidentiality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linkedin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/?p=3621</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In the recent case of Whitmar Publications Ltd v Gamage and Others, the issue of personal and professional use of social media came under the spotlight, and in particular the issue of a Linkedin password. Whereas we have seen a lot of media coverage about the use of Facebook and Twitter, and the inappropriateness or ... <a title="Case Review: Former employee forced to hand over Linkedin password" class="read-more" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/case-review-former-employee-forced-to-hand-over-linkedin-password/" aria-label="More on Case Review: Former employee forced to hand over Linkedin password">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/case-review-former-employee-forced-to-hand-over-linkedin-password/">Case Review: Former employee forced to hand over Linkedin password</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk">Do I Have A Case? - No win no fee Solicitors</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
