<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Key Cases &#8211; Do I Have A Case? &#8211; No win no fee Solicitors</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/category/employment/key-cases/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk</link>
	<description>Dispute Resolution Solicitors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 10:26:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>Employment Tribunal Cases</title>
		<link>https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/employment-tribunal-cases/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Street]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 10:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Key Cases]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/?p=3151</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Due to how our legal system works Employment Tribunal cases are not classed as precedents. (This means that they can&#8217;t be used to support any argument you or your representative are wishing to portray) However if the tribunal case is then taken further such as to the Employment Appeal Tribunal or to the Courts above ... <a title="Employment Tribunal Cases" class="read-more" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/employment-tribunal-cases/" aria-label="More on Employment Tribunal Cases">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/employment-tribunal-cases/">Employment Tribunal Cases</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk">Do I Have A Case? - No win no fee Solicitors</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Key Cases: Williams and Others v Compair Maxam</title>
		<link>https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/compair-maxamredundancy-criteria/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Street]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 10:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Key Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Redundancy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/?p=3212</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Redundancy Criteria:Williams and Others v Compair Maxam [1982] ICR 156[1] When an employer is considering having to make redundancies in the company they are not able to cherry pick the employees that they want to keep on. They instead have to have a proper redundancy criteria from which they select the employees who are to ... <a title="Key Cases: Williams and Others v Compair Maxam" class="read-more" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/compair-maxamredundancy-criteria/" aria-label="More on Key Cases: Williams and Others v Compair Maxam">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/compair-maxamredundancy-criteria/">Key Cases: Williams and Others v Compair Maxam</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk">Do I Have A Case? - No win no fee Solicitors</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Key Cases:Western Excavating v Sharp</title>
		<link>https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/key-cases-western-excavating-v-sharp/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Street]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 09:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Constructive Dismissal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Key Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constructive dismissal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[key cases]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/?p=3203</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Western Excavating v Sharp [1978] ICR 221[1] When attempting to take an employer to the tribunal for Constructive unfair dismissal one of the key cases that has to be considered is that of Western Excavating v Sharp. This case lays out the foundation elements to create constructive dismissal. The facts of the case are fairly ... <a title="Key Cases:Western Excavating v Sharp" class="read-more" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/key-cases-western-excavating-v-sharp/" aria-label="More on Key Cases:Western Excavating v Sharp">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/key-cases-western-excavating-v-sharp/">Key Cases:Western Excavating v Sharp</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk">Do I Have A Case? - No win no fee Solicitors</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Key Cases: Iceland Frozen Foods v Jones</title>
		<link>https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/iceland-frozen-foodsthe-range-of-reasonable-responses-test/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Street]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 08:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Key Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[key cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unfair Dismissal]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/?p=3189</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Range of Reasonable Responses: Iceland Frozen Foods v Jones [1983] ICR 17[1] When considering whether a misconduct dismissal was fair or not, the Tribunal not only looks at whether the employer had a reasonable belief that the employee was guilty of the misconduct (as in the Burchell test laid out in BHS v Burchell) but they ... <a title="Key Cases: Iceland Frozen Foods v Jones" class="read-more" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/iceland-frozen-foodsthe-range-of-reasonable-responses-test/" aria-label="More on Key Cases: Iceland Frozen Foods v Jones">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/iceland-frozen-foodsthe-range-of-reasonable-responses-test/">Key Cases: Iceland Frozen Foods v Jones</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk">Do I Have A Case? - No win no fee Solicitors</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Key Cases: British Home Stores v Burchell</title>
		<link>https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/the-burchell-test/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Street]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 14:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Key Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[key cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unfair Dismissal]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/?p=3171</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Burchell Test: British Home Stores v Burchell [1978] IRLR 379[1]  When a tribunal is trying to decide whether a dismissal for misconduct is fair or unfair a case that they will almost certainly look at is that of BHS v Burchell which is the basis for the Burchell Test. In this case an employee was ... <a title="Key Cases: British Home Stores v Burchell" class="read-more" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/the-burchell-test/" aria-label="More on Key Cases: British Home Stores v Burchell">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/the-burchell-test/">Key Cases: British Home Stores v Burchell</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk">Do I Have A Case? - No win no fee Solicitors</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Key Cases: Polkey v A E Dayton Services Ltd</title>
		<link>https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/polkey-v-a-e-dayton-services-ltd/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Street]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 11:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Key Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constructive dismissal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[key cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unfair Dismissal]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/?p=3163</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Polkey v AE Dayton Services Ltd [1987] UKHL 8[1] This case brought about the Polkey rule which although was formulated in a case to do with redundancy it is applicable to all other dismissals as well. The facts in this case are very simple. The employee Mr Polkey worked as a van driver for 4 ... <a title="Key Cases: Polkey v A E Dayton Services Ltd" class="read-more" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/polkey-v-a-e-dayton-services-ltd/" aria-label="More on Key Cases: Polkey v A E Dayton Services Ltd">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/polkey-v-a-e-dayton-services-ltd/">Key Cases: Polkey v A E Dayton Services Ltd</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk">Do I Have A Case? - No win no fee Solicitors</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
