<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>key cases &#8211; Do I Have A Case? &#8211; No win no fee Solicitors</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/tag/key-cases-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk</link>
	<description>Dispute Resolution Solicitors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 09:27:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>Key Cases:Western Excavating v Sharp</title>
		<link>https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/key-cases-western-excavating-v-sharp/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Street]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 09:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Constructive Dismissal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Key Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constructive dismissal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[key cases]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/?p=3203</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Western Excavating v Sharp [1978] ICR 221[1] When attempting to take an employer to the tribunal for Constructive unfair dismissal one of the key cases that has to be considered is that of Western Excavating v Sharp. This case lays out the foundation elements to create constructive dismissal. The facts of the case are fairly ... <a title="Key Cases:Western Excavating v Sharp" class="read-more" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/key-cases-western-excavating-v-sharp/" aria-label="More on Key Cases:Western Excavating v Sharp">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/key-cases-western-excavating-v-sharp/">Key Cases:Western Excavating v Sharp</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk">Do I Have A Case? - No win no fee Solicitors</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Key Cases: Iceland Frozen Foods v Jones</title>
		<link>https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/iceland-frozen-foodsthe-range-of-reasonable-responses-test/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Street]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 08:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Key Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[key cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unfair Dismissal]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/?p=3189</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Range of Reasonable Responses: Iceland Frozen Foods v Jones [1983] ICR 17[1] When considering whether a misconduct dismissal was fair or not, the Tribunal not only looks at whether the employer had a reasonable belief that the employee was guilty of the misconduct (as in the Burchell test laid out in BHS v Burchell) but they ... <a title="Key Cases: Iceland Frozen Foods v Jones" class="read-more" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/iceland-frozen-foodsthe-range-of-reasonable-responses-test/" aria-label="More on Key Cases: Iceland Frozen Foods v Jones">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/iceland-frozen-foodsthe-range-of-reasonable-responses-test/">Key Cases: Iceland Frozen Foods v Jones</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk">Do I Have A Case? - No win no fee Solicitors</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Key Cases: British Home Stores v Burchell</title>
		<link>https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/the-burchell-test/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Street]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 14:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Key Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[key cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unfair Dismissal]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/?p=3171</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Burchell Test: British Home Stores v Burchell [1978] IRLR 379[1]  When a tribunal is trying to decide whether a dismissal for misconduct is fair or unfair a case that they will almost certainly look at is that of BHS v Burchell which is the basis for the Burchell Test. In this case an employee was ... <a title="Key Cases: British Home Stores v Burchell" class="read-more" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/the-burchell-test/" aria-label="More on Key Cases: British Home Stores v Burchell">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/the-burchell-test/">Key Cases: British Home Stores v Burchell</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk">Do I Have A Case? - No win no fee Solicitors</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Key Cases: Polkey v A E Dayton Services Ltd</title>
		<link>https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/polkey-v-a-e-dayton-services-ltd/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Street]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 11:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Key Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constructive dismissal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[key cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unfair Dismissal]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/?p=3163</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Polkey v AE Dayton Services Ltd [1987] UKHL 8[1] This case brought about the Polkey rule which although was formulated in a case to do with redundancy it is applicable to all other dismissals as well. The facts in this case are very simple. The employee Mr Polkey worked as a van driver for 4 ... <a title="Key Cases: Polkey v A E Dayton Services Ltd" class="read-more" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/polkey-v-a-e-dayton-services-ltd/" aria-label="More on Key Cases: Polkey v A E Dayton Services Ltd">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/polkey-v-a-e-dayton-services-ltd/">Key Cases: Polkey v A E Dayton Services Ltd</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk">Do I Have A Case? - No win no fee Solicitors</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
