<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>redundancy &#8211; Do I Have A Case? &#8211; No win no fee Solicitors</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/tag/redundancy-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk</link>
	<description>Dispute Resolution Solicitors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Feb 2016 13:33:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
	<item>
		<title>Incompetent employer does not necessarily make a dismissal unfair.</title>
		<link>https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/incompetent-employer-does-not-necessarily-make-a-dismissal-unfair/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Street]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 10:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Redundancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redundancy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/?p=3703</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Employment solicitors who act for respondents are probably all breathing a sigh of relief following a decision by the Employment Appeal Tribunal. The case in question (Osoba v Chief Constable of Herts) related to a claim for unfair dismissal and age discrimination following a redundancy proceedings. The issue in this case revolved around the scoring ... <a title="Incompetent employer does not necessarily make a dismissal unfair." class="read-more" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/incompetent-employer-does-not-necessarily-make-a-dismissal-unfair/" aria-label="More on Incompetent employer does not necessarily make a dismissal unfair.">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/incompetent-employer-does-not-necessarily-make-a-dismissal-unfair/">Incompetent employer does not necessarily make a dismissal unfair.</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk">Do I Have A Case? - No win no fee Solicitors</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Case Study: Redundancy and Unfair Dismissal. A Witness can make all the difference.</title>
		<link>https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/case-study-redundancy-and-unfair-dismissal-a-witness-can-make-all-the-difference/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Street]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2013 14:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Redundancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redundancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[witness]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/?p=3592</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>We were consulted by an individual who felt that he had been unfairly selected for redundancy. His employer, a large manufacturing company, decided to restructure one of its factory operations and as part of this process, having taken advice from its Human Resources department, it decided that, once it had created the new structure, it ... <a title="Case Study: Redundancy and Unfair Dismissal. A Witness can make all the difference." class="read-more" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/case-study-redundancy-and-unfair-dismissal-a-witness-can-make-all-the-difference/" aria-label="More on Case Study: Redundancy and Unfair Dismissal. A Witness can make all the difference.">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/case-study-redundancy-and-unfair-dismissal-a-witness-can-make-all-the-difference/">Case Study: Redundancy and Unfair Dismissal. A Witness can make all the difference.</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk">Do I Have A Case? - No win no fee Solicitors</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Collective redundancy consultations: Government changes</title>
		<link>https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/changes-in-large-scale-redundancy-consultations/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chloe George]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 12:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Redundancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[large scale redundancies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redundancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/?p=2708</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>On the 6th April 2013 the Government introduced a rather significant change to the rules relating to collective redundancy that companies have to abide by. With regard to what it meant by collective the Government have classed it as any company that is looking to make 100 or more staff members redundant. The rule change ... <a title="Collective redundancy consultations: Government changes" class="read-more" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/changes-in-large-scale-redundancy-consultations/" aria-label="More on Collective redundancy consultations: Government changes">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/changes-in-large-scale-redundancy-consultations/">Collective redundancy consultations: Government changes</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk">Do I Have A Case? - No win no fee Solicitors</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Osborne: “Give up your employee rights and own a slice of the company”</title>
		<link>https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/osborne-give-up-your-employee-rights-and-own-a-slice-of-the-company/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chloe.george]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 21:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maternity Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unfair Dismissal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beecroft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redundancy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/?p=1965</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>George Osborne resurrected controversial plans to dilute workers’ rights by announcing at the Conservative Party Conference that employees can give up some of their legal rights at work in return for shares in the company. Already being called “Beecroft by the back door”, referring to the divisive report on employment legislation by venture capitalist and ... <a title="Osborne: “Give up your employee rights and own a slice of the company”" class="read-more" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/osborne-give-up-your-employee-rights-and-own-a-slice-of-the-company/" aria-label="More on Osborne: “Give up your employee rights and own a slice of the company”">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/osborne-give-up-your-employee-rights-and-own-a-slice-of-the-company/">Osborne: “Give up your employee rights and own a slice of the company”</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk">Do I Have A Case? - No win no fee Solicitors</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ministry of Justice confirms introduction of Employment Tribunal Fees</title>
		<link>https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/ministry-of-justice-confirms-introduction-of-employment-tribunal-fees/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Simpson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 14:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment tribunals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redundancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unfair Dismissal]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/?p=1770</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>We knew it was in the pipeline and this week the Ministry of Justice set out its&#8217; plans for introducing fees to the employment tribunal system. It is currently proposed that these fees will commence in Summer 2013. If you are an individual wanting to bring a claim against your employer this is currently free ... <a title="Ministry of Justice confirms introduction of Employment Tribunal Fees" class="read-more" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/ministry-of-justice-confirms-introduction-of-employment-tribunal-fees/" aria-label="More on Ministry of Justice confirms introduction of Employment Tribunal Fees">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/ministry-of-justice-confirms-introduction-of-employment-tribunal-fees/">Ministry of Justice confirms introduction of Employment Tribunal Fees</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk">Do I Have A Case? - No win no fee Solicitors</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Headcount reduction not necessary for redundancy</title>
		<link>https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/headcount-reduction-not-necessary-for-redundancy/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joseph Simpson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2012 21:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Case Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dismissal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redundancy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/?p=1758</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In the recent case of Packman t/a Packman Lucas Associates v Fauchon (EAT/0017/12) the Employment Appeal Tribunal confirmed that an employee who was dismissed because of a downturn in the employer&#8217;s work (and therefore a reduction in the hours to be worked) was dismissed on grounds of redundancy &#8211; even though there was no reduction ... <a title="Headcount reduction not necessary for redundancy" class="read-more" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/headcount-reduction-not-necessary-for-redundancy/" aria-label="More on Headcount reduction not necessary for redundancy">Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk/headcount-reduction-not-necessary-for-redundancy/">Headcount reduction not necessary for redundancy</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.doihaveacase.co.uk">Do I Have A Case? - No win no fee Solicitors</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
